140- Fossil fuels, priceless damage

Climate lawsuits just got a trillion-dollar boost

What is the price of a hotter planet? ā™»ļø

What if you could send the world’s biggest oil companies a bill for climate change?

Turns out, now you can.
A landmark study has just put a price tag on something long considered incalculable: the damage caused by fossil fuel giants. We’re talking trillions of dollars in losses—health, agriculture, infrastructure—directly linked to emissions from specific companies.

If you’re putting your money where your values are, this is the article you’ll want to read.

Infographic ranking the top 10 fossil fuel companies by their estimated contribution to global warming. Chevron ranks first, contributing 0.025°C, followed by Saudi Aramco (0.023°C), Gazprom (0.020°C), and ExxonMobil (0.019°C). The chart highlights cumulative climate damage estimated at $28 trillion, linking each company to a specific temperature rise contribution. Other companies listed include National Iranian Oil Co., BP, Shell, Pemex, Coal India, and British Coal Corporation.

Top 10 Fossil Fuel Companies Linked to $28 Trillion in Climate Damage and Global Warming

The numbers🌱

A peer-reviewed study published in Nature (2024) calculated the climate-related economic damages from emissions traced to 21 major fossil fuel producers between 1988 and 2022. The numbers are staggering:

  • ExxonMobil: over $500 billion in estimated climate damages

  • Chevron, BP, Shell, and Saudi Aramco: each above $400 billion

  • In total, the damages exceed $5.4 trillion

The authors used a climate model known as the social cost of carbon—a metric used by governments to estimate the economic harm of each ton of COā‚‚. By combining this with historical emissions data, they traced billions in damage to individual corporations.

🧾 This is the first time science has provided a legally robust, company-specific estimate of economic responsibility for global warming.

Multi-panel graph showing projected energy supply trends for coal, oil, and natural gas (in exajoules per year) from 2020 to 2100 under three climate mitigation scenarios (C1, C2, and C3). Each row represents a different scenario: C1 (high mitigation), C2 (moderate mitigation), and C3 (low mitigation). Each column shows a different fossil fuel. Median pathways are highlighted along with interquartile ranges and individual model trajectories. Final box plots display cumulative supply estimates for each fuel type by scenario.

Projected global supply pathways for Coal, Oil, and Gas to 2100 Under Three Climate Scenarios

Looking ahead

If you're an investor, this is a flashing neon sign: the era of climate accountability is here.

  • Litigation risk: Fossil fuel stocks may now carry legal liabilities worth hundreds of billions.

  • Reputational fallout: ESG ratings could tank. Institutions might divest.

  • Opportunity: Renewables and climate-adaptive technologies will look increasingly attractive—not just morally, but financially.

Ready to dive into sustainable investing?

Subscribe to The Climate Mentor today to get updates on the latest trends, tips, and news on climate change.

Enjoy the newsletter? Please forward this to a friend šŸ‘„

It only takes 15 seconds. Making this took me 10 hours⌚

Reply

or to participate.